| ▲ | toomuchtodo 15 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Texas policy is actively hostile to women and the poor (healthcare, labor protections, etc). You’re probably fine if of means, and not a woman of reproductive age. Everyone else is existing in Texas as an economic human factory farm. https://spectrumlocalnews.com/tx/south-texas-el-paso/news/20... https://www.cnbc.com/2024/07/13/10-states-worst-quality-of-l... https://www.propublica.org/article/texas-abortion-ban-miscar... https://www.propublica.org/article/texas-maternal-mortality-... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | scoofy 15 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
California is hostile to the poor. When median income in SF is $140K per household. A two-bedroom apartment costs $5000 per month. It's literally illegal to build housing for actual poor people who have jobs there. I know plenty of working class folks in the 40s and 50s here in SF with multiple roommates, because CA has effectively become a rent-seeking paradise. There is no future for these people. They will eventually lose their housing and either move to a state like Texas or become homeless. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||