There is a significant movement in conservative circles that "the census should literally only be a count". this could be a wedge to prevent detailed demographic data collection by the government

▲

Alive-in-2025 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If you don’t count people of different races, nationalities, origin, then you can pretend there are only white people. You don’t know if there are any marginalized people gathered in say an extremely poor neighborhood, because they are all people.

I see it as a way to pretend there’s just white people.

▲

Arodex 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Those "conservative circles" don't exist anymore - if they ever. MAGA ate them, chew them and spit them.

▲

coldtea 2 hours ago | parent [-]

The problem is not that MAGA "ate them, chew them and spit them", but that the traditional neoliberal shit GOP circles "ate, chew and spit" the MAGA movement and what people voted Trump for. Instead Trump was fully assimilated to the Borg/Swamp, with a big fuck you to the MAGA promises (except the show he put on about immigration).

▲

Dylan16807 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Trump was never ever going to drain the swamp.

And I wouldn't say he served existing entrenched interests very well either. To the extent he touched the swamp it was to put in worse people only he liked.

	▲	coldtea 40 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		>Trump was never ever going to drain the swamp. Doesn't matter for the point of the argument, he was elected on that promise, and others, that he eventually broke.

▲

xnx 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

But a count of what?

▲

radiator 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Population in a city?

▲

oh_my_goodness 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

A count of people.

	▲	xnx an hour ago \| parent [-]
		All people or citizen people?

▲

boppo1 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Wouldnt that hurt the conservative cause though?

	▲	fragmede 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Count of people - brown people removed = success