I doubt that the capabilities of GPT-5.5-cyber aren’t known by the US government considering OpenAI is their primary LLM partner after Anthropic had concerns about using models for autonomous weaponry and mass surveillance of US citizens. If anything, they should have more experience in GPT-5.5s full feature set due to longer access and may even already have GPT-5.6 access.

▲

bobthepanda an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Hanlon's razor. Are the people with the right access talking to the right people? Wouldn't be the first time for miscommunication in the executive branch.

▲

Topfi 36 minutes ago | parent [-]

Fair point, not unlikely, though my personal assumption is that, like with Nvidia export controls, there will be a sudden reversal with no tangible, actual, technically based reason the second a certain person has their ring kissed...

	▲	bobthepanda 5 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Why not both? The current executive has missed the mark on appointments pretty badly a number of times due to the prizing of loyalty over competency.

▲

lebovic 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

They made a deal for access, but I'm unsure if it's usable, scaled, and has vulnerabilities attributed to it at this point. But I have no inside information here, so I could be wrong.

	▲	throwaway85825 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		If it had vulnerabilities the marketing copy would already be written and published.