| ▲ | zimpenfish 3 hours ago | |
> 2024 [...] the DNC's continuous forcing of awful corpocrats with zero charisma would've become completely untenable and Trump would've been limited to one term. You mean the 2024 election cycle where incumbents all around the globe were beaten because the economic situation was strongly anti-incumbent? Are you positing that the US election was somehow a unique outlier and solely down to Harris being the Democrat candidate? Even though a swing of 115k votes would have handed the presidency to Harris instead? It sounds like you have a particular issue with the 2016 and 2024 elections and I'm wondering if there's something in common that might explain it... | ||
| ▲ | fugalfervor 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |
Democratic candidate, not "Democrat candidate". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democrat_Party_%28epithet%29?w... Hillary Clinton won the popular vote. People didn't want Trump in 2016, they wanted her. But he won the electoral college, He won the popular vote in 2024, but the tight margin in the electoral college suggests a democratically elected Democratic candidate (i.e. one selected by a primary, not one appointed by the sitting president) could have won instead. Other potential candidates were polling better than Harriss. I personally think Gretchen Whitmer could have successfully distanced herself from the Biden administration and defeated Trump. | ||