Remix.run Logo
aix1 4 hours ago

Given Amazon's fairly large equity stake in Anthropic, I really don't get their motivation. Anyone care to speculate?

plaidfuji an hour ago | parent | next [-]

As much as it’s tempting to read some kind of ulterior motive into this, I think the most reasonable explanation is that AWS, as perhaps the single biggest point of failure in the backbone of US IT infrastructure, has legitimate concerns about its ability to fend off attacks from bad actors armed with the most advanced models.

lubujackson 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Everyone is assuming this isn't a positive outcome for Anthropic. Think about the optics: everyone was shitting on Anthropic for silently downgrading Fable. Now that is forgotten, they have a chance to spend a week or two revising their approach, then will come out with a "Gov't approved" version and life goes on.

Most importantly, Anthropic has been too "uppity" and needed to be put in their place by the powers that be. Power hates disruption. Restrictions, control (and investment) are defenses against transformative tech. Amazon needs Anthropic to bend the knee for their investment to have long term value - the sooner the better.

JumpCrisscross 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> Everyone is assuming this isn't a positive outcome for Anthropic

It’s not. Shitting on or not, Fable was being used and clearly folks were running up bills. This is political retribution against Anthropic, pure and simple. The fact that Anthropic may be able to spin that doesn’t change what it fundamentally is.

petra 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It depends what the end goal may be.

If the end goal is that only regulated US companies can use Fable, that is a pretty good outcome for Amazon, and also for Jeff Bezos's new startup which aims to use AI to monopolize large industries that depend on advanced engineering in the physical world.

logicchains 3 hours ago | parent [-]

>If the end goal is that only regulated US companies can use Fable, that is a pretty good outcome for Amazon

It's a terrible outcome for Amazon because it destroys Anthropic's revenue. Roughly half of Anthropic's customers are foreigners, and they wouldn't use Anthropic if its next generation model was banned while other providers' next generation models aren't. And if the US follows through and bans all Mythos-level models for foreigners, then in 6-12 months the entire global market will be overtaken by China when its models catch up, and Amazon will lose money on its investment in OpenAI too.

baq an hour ago | parent [-]

Immediate revenue impact is basically 0 - nobody cancels their Claude sub because Fable isn’t why they got it in the first place (by nobody I mean like 1% of total users and they’re likely net neutral tokenmaxxers for revenue).

Signal to OpenAI and Google is clear: can’t release too smart models or they get controlled. It follows there is no danger to revenue since other providers are forced to plateau at the same level.

…which puts the whole train the next model business idea a risky proposition since the training can’t ever pay for itself - but USG really wants you to keep training, so guess what happens?

Oh and re China - if you think they’ll release an open Mythos-class model, I have a bridge to sell.

skeptic_ai 26 minutes ago | parent [-]

Why China wouldn’t release?

vulcan01 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think it's just to hype Anthropic. Check it out, we have products so dangerous the government banned them, we must be so advanced. (Their competitors cannot make such a claim.)

SpicyLemonZest 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You think Dario called up Andy Jassy and told him "Hey, we're trying to get Fable banned, so can you please go talk to the government and tell them that they need to ban it"?

throwaway85825 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yes and in a year they will ask for a government bailout because of the ban.

kypro 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

He's always talking about how dangerous AI is, how the models he's building could be used for cyber attacks, and how if his company is successful then at least 50% of the white-collar workforce will lose their jobs.

Doesn't seem that unlikely he might say something like that.. Unless he's super-villain evil it sounds like he believes the government needs to do something?

simianwords 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

sorry but when will this line of cute conspiracy theories stop? do you really think this was premeditated to hype up Anthropic?

solenoid0937 an hour ago | parent | next [-]

It doesn't stop, about 75% of HN users mistake being conspiratorial/cynical for sounding smart.

siimianwords 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]

re-thc 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's not ZDR so none of the megacorps are using it anyway. Microsoft already complained.

If you can't use it then might as well get rid of it.

aix1 4 hours ago | parent [-]

But Amazon has a fairly large equity position in Anthropic. Why mess with that?

re-thc 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> But Amazon has a fairly large equity position in Anthropic. Why mess with that?

Read the fine prints. None of these hyperscaler deals are $ for equity. It's some provide hosting, rentals etc. With how things are going they can just find another customer.

aix1 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> None of these hyperscaler deals are $ for equity.

As of Feb, Amazon held $45.8 billion of convertible notes and $14.8 billion of nonvoting preferred stock in Anthropic.

Source: https://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-ai-bet-anthropic-soar...

jazzyjackson 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes OP is saying they didn’t pay all cash for those shares

s1artibartfast 2 hours ago | parent [-]

So they dont care about it? How is that relevant?

If I have 5% of a company, I dont care if I traded services or cash for it.

re-thc 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> If I have 5% of a company

IF

You may not. The whole AI circular finance deals don't work that way. Maybe just maybe this 1 does but 90% don't. There's some SPV (special purpose vehicle) that holds some of the assets and leases it back to the main company. The backers sort of support the SPV and the lenders lose out.

For example SpaceX claimed to raise a huge round from Nvidia. They got maybe 5% of it as real cash. The rest is Nvidia taking its own GPUs into SPV and leasing it to SpaceX. Nothing changed hands.

Another example is see AMD's OpenAI deal. You get x% shares after using so much GPUs.

So there's shiny announcements and there's how much are real shares with no terms paid with cash.

> I dont care if I traded services or cash for it.

The point is you might not even have it OR it got massively diluted in creative ways.

deafpolygon 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Drive it down so they can buy more equity?

whynotmaybe 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

In business, nothing's off limit to destroy others.

You can be better, or you can report them for any "illegal" stuff.

doubleorseven 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

they figured out taking fable off plans at 22/6 was a bad idea business wise so they maneuvered

SpicyLemonZest 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I would speculate that they were concerned, as many people familiar with frontier AI models are, that they are dangerous and could be misused to do bad things.

SubiculumCode 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Everyone assumes that it is business motivated. Perhaps, but perhaps that business motivation is the fact that this group at Amazon had reportedly many past interaction with the Administration about AI safety, and this being just the latest interaction.

sumeno 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yeah... because Amazon is famous for caring about safety over profits...

SpicyLemonZest 2 hours ago | parent [-]

If Amazon's stake in Anthropic goes up 10x, but American national security is fatally compromised in the process, I kinda doubt that's net profitable for Amazon. They're not going to be able to deliver in 2 days or hit AWS sales targets if everyone's drowning in cyberattacks.