| ▲ | Schnitz 3 hours ago | |
This is super common with startups and is usually called an orderly shutdown. You don’t want to wait until you are insolvent, but stop when there is enough money left to pay all outstanding liabilities as well as the people that will shut down the business entity, do a final tax return and so on. Then whatever is left eventually gets paid back to investors, who usually have a liquidation preference requiring this as well. The alternative, running truly out of money, no one shutting down anything, a ghost entity that continues to accumulate taxes and penalties, creditors chasing whoever they can get a hold of, is much worse. Just because everyone quits doesn’t mean the entity ceases to exist. | ||
| ▲ | killingtime74 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |
Worse and also most likely illegal too (sometimes jail or ban on running companies). Depends on where you do it. | ||