| ▲ | throwawa1 5 hours ago |
| Disenfranchise who? Something I find interesting is that Europe and the United States are experiencing the largest migration in human history yet no one talks about this. Taking a step back, looking at it from a systems perspective, the migrations are working as planned. Designed to subvert Democracy. What does it mean to have a vote when you import 10 new voters who disagree with you? |
|
| ▲ | airstrike 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| How do you get the idea that migration is "planned"? You've lost the plot entirely |
| |
| ▲ | ptidhomme 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Someone must be funding the NGOs organizing it all. | | |
| ▲ | airstrike 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | George Soros, probably | | |
| ▲ | mantas an hour ago | parent [-] | | I wouldn’t be surprised looking at his historical track record of funding NGOs with specific angles and what he said. |
|
| |
| ▲ | Dig1t an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The UN literally has a document on their website called "Replacement migration : is it a solution to declining and ageing populations?" >https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/412547?v=pdf You can find dozens of clips of politicians and billionaires also talking about the need to replace the low fertility population with immigration. | | |
| ▲ | lkjdsklf a minute ago | parent [-] | | Except that has nothing to do with voting which is the claim that was being made |
| |
| ▲ | vitalyan1234 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [dead] | |
| ▲ | throwawa1 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | One example is HIAS who runs a fully staffed Darién Gap facility. As soon as there is a friendly administration to mass migration - they just flip a switch and we will have 10 millions of migrants. I don't want to come across as MAGA, because I am a non voter - the Republicans fuel the fire with forever wars. Its really two sides of the same coin. Companies benefit, because when there is no social cohesion workers are less likely to Unionize. | | |
| ▲ | cyberax 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | "Tens of millions"? Really? Even if we take 20 million, that's 75% of the total population of Venezuela or half of the population of Colombia. There simply are not enough people in South America for these kinds of numbers. | | |
| ▲ | Dig1t an hour ago | parent [-] | | Chuck Schumer: >“We have a population that is not reproducing on its own with the same level that it used to. The only way we’re going to have a great future in America is if we welcome and embrace immigrants – the Dreamers and all of them, because our ultimate goal is to help the Dreamers but [also] to get a path to citizenship for all 11 million or however many undocumented there are here,” Chuck Schumer, who is massively understating the number of illegals here, puts it at at least 11M. So yeah tens of millions is a realistic ballpark. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | LPisGood 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| As planned by whom? |
| |
| ▲ | throwawa1 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | The Epstein class. Bankers, Zionists who lost their civilization and Temple 2000 years ago: A good google search to view art owned by one family: "Artist funded by de Rothschild's depicts racial violence and rape themes" | | |
|
|
| ▲ | youngtaff 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Immigrants don’t get a vote in many countries For example Europeans were excluded from the Brexit vote |
| |
| ▲ | Dig1t an hour ago | parent [-] | | Voting in these countries takes place largely along ethnic lines. Go look at maps of "if only X demographic voted", there is a clear incentive for certain parties to import people just because changing the ethnic makeup of the country will give them political power (immigrants have kids who are citizens and will vote along their ethnic lines). Additionally there are efforts to naturalize refugees and illegals: Chuck Schumer: "We have a population that is not reproducing on its own with the same level that it used to. The only way we’re going to have a great future in America is if we welcome and embrace immigrants – the Dreamers and all of them, because our ultimate goal is to help the Dreamers but [also] to get a path to citizenship for all 11 million or however many undocumented there are here" "Path to citizenship" here implies that he wants them to be able to vote. https://cis.org/Arthur/Schumer-Calls-DREAM-Amnesty |
|
|
| ▲ | watwut 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| 1.) Migration is constant and big topic. 2.) Democracy happens to be destroyed by local far right movements, composed of people who were there for years and did not migrated anywhere. The extend of foreign destruction is Vance trying to destroy democracy in Europe openly, Putin doing it secretly and Musk openly enciting pogroms. None of them immigrated to EU. |
| |
| ▲ | mantas an hour ago | parent [-] | | Mainstream parties could take a hard stance on immigration and destroy „far right movements“ overnight. But somehow they are not interested in saving the democracy, instead they prefer to ignore hot topics and pretend they don’t exist. Hmmm, maybe it is this ignorance destroying the democracy? | | |
| ▲ | watwut an hour ago | parent [-] | | > Mainstream parties could take a hard stance on immigration and destroy „far right movements“ overnight. No they would not. It would just empower far right to make further demands as everything shifted toward them. And you can even see it practically, each time mainstream parties move toward right, far right becomes stronger. Meanwhile, anti-far-right voters end up without anyone to vote for. Becoming far right yourself does not cure far right, it makes far right stronger. Far right voters wont vote for you, why would they? And voting for you achieves nothing, you wont oppose far right anyway. > Hmmm, maybe it is this ignorance destroying the democracy? No, it is far right who is openly trying to destroy democracy. And helping them wont save the democracy. Blaming mainstream or left for what far-right does also does not help democracy. |
|
|
