| ▲ | FireBeyond 2 hours ago | |
I mean the word "Relay" in Internet Relay Chat was meant to refer to relaying between servers. Larger networks even had some hub servers that didn't allow users to connect at all, and existed to be server interchanges. IRCv3 missed the boat by years. By 2016, when the working group was formed, IRC was already well past its glory years. Even then, it took til the 2020s before any major network fully adopted it. Because - and I say this as a nerd who held an O line on two of those major networks at one point in my life - a bunch of nerds got hung up on arguing about implementation specs rather than looking at features and functionality organically. Ironically, in the quest to avoid becoming a closed Discord/Slack/what-have-you ecosystem product, they needed a product manager to remind them that what they needed to build in that working group was an evolution to IRCv2, not endless arguments over the format of configuration files for server daemons, for but one example. > And ~15 years ago we got native support for authentication (https://ircv3.net/specs/extensions/sasl-3.1) The IRCv3 WG was convened near the end of 2016, so 9 or so. | ||
| ▲ | 47282847 an hour ago | parent [-] | |
> IRCv3 missed the boat by years Because people invested/wasted their energy into building proprietary silos instead. | ||