25% every journey, or 25% over the lifetime of the car? Neither seems really believable but I don't understand how else you would measure this.

▲

regularfry 2 days ago | parent [-]

25% of cars. It was... not good.

▲

dmurray 2 days ago | parent [-]

So like... One in four cars would break down at the side of the road before it was otherwise EOL? One roadside breakdown every 800,000 miles or so? That really doesn't sound bad.

	▲	regularfry 13 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Not in the first 800,000. Maybe in the first 8,000. They really struggled with reliability early on the E65, they introduced a lot of new (to them) technology all at once.
	▲	irishcoffee 2 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		It wasn’t/isn’t. The reactions in this subthread surprised me. I guess it’s an anti-ICE thing?