> Imagine a super intelligent speed reading human in a library.

If human abilities were different then human laws would be different. We don't have speed limits for joggers but we do for cars because their abilities are materially different.

Machines aren’t humans. Your first have to argue that an analogy between machine and human even makes any kind of sense.

That‘s the magic trick you are doing with your analogy. You just assume that human/machine analogy is true.

Is that super speed reading human going to then make itself available to instantly-ish answer any and every possible question from anyone with a paid subscription?

This argument is pretty lame.

By extension, do also believe this super intelligent human should have no human rights and be enslaved by Anthropic for profit?

Reading this comment is like visiting a care home for dementia patients

Imagine a super greedy company putting every bit information they can, willingly and maliciously hiding the origin of training data, into a computer and reselling that data. Such wow. Much shittie metaphor.

[dead]

The internet is still on?

Agreed. That's why it's disgusting that these AI companies charge such outrageous fees for information they should be giving back to us for free.