Yeah all they care about is safety, but lets see how many of them quits once US government command them to work on autonomous killbots.

▲

holmesworcester 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

To make sure we keep track of what we're talking about with loss-of-control x-risk, a sufficiently smart version of Claude Code is more deadly than any government's army of autonomous killbots, because it can recursively self improve and has unpredictable training-induced preferences.

▲

SXX 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Sufficiently smart version of Claude Code: dont exist.

Autonomous flying killbots: exist.

Once somebody scientifically prove and shows any kind of self-improving software we can start bothering about it. I pretty sure everyone trying to do it and it would be all over the news once its here.

	▲	plaguuuuuu an hour ago \| parent [-]
		That's exactly what Fable is. They use Fable to improve Fable. I reckon the successful experiments must go into the model training set with a strong RL signal, and that is why they are so paranoid about people using Fable for LLM tasks. Fable knows what it did to improve itself. Pure speculation of course.

▲

mx7zysuj4xew 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

That's ridiculous scifi nonsense

▲

nerfbatplz 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Dario blinked when he was asked to do it and Sam Altman was in Hegseth's DMs promising all the AI child killing the US government can order up within minutes. No one meaningful will quit over this, that's why all of the biggest US tech companies can march in pride parades and provide compute to the perpetrators of the genocide in Gaza at the same time.

▲

esseph 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Can you show me a world power that is not trying to use cutting edge AI for military purposes?

	▲	shimman an hour ago \| parent [-]
		This is a poor way of framing the question, a better one would be can you find me another world power that is misallocating trillions of capital in vaporware with very little to show for it?