He asked for an independent body.

No, he asked for the government to make the decision in light of 3rd party analysis. Which is what happened here - an independent company demonstrated a jailbreak, and the government issued a restriction on deployment based on that finding.

▲

theshrike79 43 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

So if I can demonstrate a jailbreak in ChatGPT, the government will immediately slap a "no foreign nationals" ban on GPT-5.5?

▲

llelouch 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

"The government should have the power to block or deter deployment of the model if it is determined, in light of third-party assessment, to present unacceptable risks. This power must be scoped to the above four specific risks and there must be protective measures against political favoritism or arbitrary decisions."

You are wrong.

Read in full here https://darioamodei.com/post/policy-on-the-ai-exponential.

I know you won't though. haha.

	▲	Imnimo an hour ago \| parent [-]
		I am having trouble understanding which ingredient you feel is missing here. Can you be more specific? It seems to me that the there was a third party assessment, they identified risks associated with the specific risk groups, and the government therefore chose to block the model's deployment.

▲

treme 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

that's cute