He spent that much time and you still misunderstood the direct message and missed the subtext.

The lie is coding is solved, the proof is they had an outstanding coding issue they were working on for over a year while saying coding is solved. There’s a great number of other issues with their own software that disprove their premise, but you only need one counter example to disprove something.

And because you missed it, the subtext was they want you to use loops not because they work but because they burn lots of tokens thus making them more money.

▲

panarky a day ago | parent [-]

One unresolved bug does not disprove anything.

	▲	Retric a day ago \| parent \| next [-]
		A major outstanding software bug for a year proves they have not “solved coding,” which was their claim. I didn’t chose the words they used, but I can hold them to those words.
	▲	a day ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		[deleted]
	▲	ryan_n a day ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		The point is if "coding is solved" was true, there would not be any unresolved bugs.
	▲	slopinthebag a day ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		And saying coding is solved doesn't prove anything either.
	▲	a day ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[deleted]