Remix.run Logo
anigbrowl 7 hours ago

Odd that the article doesn't mention parties at all, although perhaps this was in an attempt to avoid accusations of partisanship that might ensue from stating facts.

Anyway, a quick look at https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/6028... indicates that all 4 sponsors of the bill are Republicans. The Actions tab seems to indicated that the bill got only 12 minutes of debate before being passed,; I hope this is an artifact of how the page is updated rather than the actual time spent on considering it.

bigstrat2003 5 hours ago | parent [-]

The article doesn't mention parties because it's irrelevant. A bad bill is bad on its merits, not because of who has brought it about.

Grombobulous 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The identity of the people who crafted the bill is the second most relevant thing besides the bill itself.

colonCapitalDee 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Ignoring power politics doesn't make them go away

joshka 3 hours ago | parent [-]

But calling them out in a partisan may disincentivize half of the people to understand the issue.

CursedSilicon an hour ago | parent [-]

If those people want to treat political parties like sports teams then they aren't likely going to contribute much to the discussion

thereisnospork 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

For those of us at home who need to decide which team to root for its very much relevant when and what bills a party sponsors.