| ▲ | colechristensen 8 hours ago | |||||||
Last night I switched back to Codex for a minute having burned through my tokens for the week with Fable and oh boy I had a terrible experience. Running in circles over simple problems (which I ended up solving myself, like a peasant) and running "terraform apply" several times despite several instructions all over the place to never do that. The performance difference was stark. | ||||||||
| ▲ | malshe 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I had a similar experience. So far Fable has been a game changer, at least for the work I used it for. Having said that, I think its writing is definitely worse than GPT 5.5. Ethan Mollick also observed the same. He called it more "Claudy." It generates worse academic prose than other frontier models. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | nsingh2 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Could you provide some details, if possible, like what model & thinking effort, what kinds of tasks? I used to swap between Claude Code and Codex often, and these days use Codex more because of the usage limits. Wondering if I should go to Claude for a month, I get a strange FOMO when I read vague comments like this. The one major difference I noticed is that the GPT models are more analytical (e.g. better at mathematical analysis, code review) vs Claude models tend to write more straight forward code. Besides that I don't really see any significant differences. There are a few gotchas with swapping, like being careful with AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md naming (Claude Code only recognizes CLAUDE.md, and I think Codex only works with AGENTS.md), and updating skill files to match the tool. | ||||||||
| ||||||||