We already had this. It was called Theranos.

fragmede 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I don't know if we "had" something called Theranos. In fact, I believe that was the subject of a couple of lawsuit because we didn't.

▲

rowanG077 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I'm not sure what this comment is trying to say. Theranos was a company build from the ground up on fraud. Apple, for all its faults, is provably at the forefront of technology used in personal computing devices.

▲

huxley 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I think you've captured exactly what they are trying to say

	▲	rowanG077 15 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		This doesn't exactly make it clearer. I can think of two things it can imply. Neither make a lick of sense: - Theranos was at the forefront of medical technology - Apple is a fraudulent company to the core

▲

im3w1l an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Apple is first and foremost an affordable luxury brand that makes sleek hardware.

	▲	rowanG077 13 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		And theranos did that too? Theranos, a medical company, was an affordable luxury (??) brand that makes sleek hardware? In fact the hardware was not sleek at all, since it didn't function.