| ▲ | DavideNL 2 hours ago | |
Noob question, but how do people know this is thrustworthy, since it's not from Arch / an official source? There's a lot of voodoo in that script, i can't easily tell it's safe by reading the code. I'd expect some reaction/solution from official Arch developers... | ||
| ▲ | kpcyrd 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |
You could try rkhunter or unhide from the official repositories, but I haven't tested this myself and I don't know how well they work with BPF rootkits (and/or this one specifically). All of the packages I have triaged involved the atomic-lockfile npm package, so this is something you could try:
The problem with an officially endorsed solution is that the rootkit authors could push an update that hides/removes the indicators of compromise the endorsed script checks for (e.g. it would be trivial to have the malware delete atomic-lockfile from the npm cache). | ||