> JertLinc3522: the mistake was from AI agent not from Human, since it was the agent I should have refund

That really makes me wonder: is it coming from

A) a general sense of entitlement

B) seeing the agent as a human-like and able to bear responsibility

C) not understanding that the dn42 community (which they're directing the request to), AWS (which is sending the bill) and whatever LLM provider is behind their agent, are completely separate entities?

▲

blitzar 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

d) trying it on in any way possible

e) low intelligence

▲

latexr 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> B) seeing the agent as a human-like and able to bear responsibility

Then they should ask the agent for the refund, since they claim it was at fault.

▲

ninjamar 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

maybe they weren't trying to be malicous; they could easily be an unwitting teenager

	▲	nairboon 4 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Teenager with a credit card?
	▲	brazzy 4 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		How was I implying they were malicious? "Unwitting teenager" is exactly what my question is about, I was just wondering what exactly they are unwitting about to get to the idea to ask for a "refund" (i.e. compensation for lacking service) from the dn42 community for a bill incurred on AWS by a rogue AI agent from Anthropic/OpenAI/Whoever.