I don't understand what you mean by "objective" here.

You're welcome to believe that the pricing I quoted is low and enterprise companies pay more than that, despite the abundant evidence I've provided in this thread.

It sounds to me like you think I'm biased towards Anthropic, despite me highlighting how their model charged $12 for a two line CSS change due to it being "relentlessly proactive".

(I also called their behavior "egregious" just yesterday: https://twitter.com/simonw/status/2064936762099789960)

A better way of putting this is that you do not actually understand or care about the risks of the technologies you are pushing.

We can look at what a ZDR means, or we can look at what a ZDR does not mean, which is like all files and what that means for... do you actually care?

As a human being, do you, Simon Wilson, give a shit about another human being besides yourself?

Do you have any thing that matters besides something that rides a bike?

Or is your excuse that technology is going to technology.

Then some of us are going to call you out for being complicit. You can be mad about your complicity, doesn't change your complicity.

What you are saying is bullshit and what you are saying when it comes to the unit cost per token is based off of pro-athropic or OAI.

Nothing you are saying, outside of what you are doing for OAI or Anthropic is true or trustworthy.

You, as a human being, are a propagandist for AI.

Do you question for what I think about you or the objectivity, or lack there of, for you are, your pelican riding a bicycle, and what that means for every one else besides you?

Also, when it comes to tokens, who's tokens? You tokens, you paying for that shit?

Is it worth it?