"Solve Garbage Collection in C# for HFT · $10.00 raised of est. $200.00 target"

This can't be serious.

Broader point I am making is, what differentiates genuine ideas from the token burn? What happens when the pool exhausts but the task is not done?

▲

asp_hornet 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

From my 10 years in the .net, it seemed C# devs will pretty much do anything to avoid using the right tool for the job or solving the immediate problem at hand.

▲

bethekidyouwant 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You keep putting money into the slot and pulling the lever

	▲	jimkleiber 4 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		But at least collectively pulling it :-)
	▲	fragmede 4 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Real question is, how do you get press for this site after this falls off HN?

▲

kevin_thibedeau 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The sarcastic solution is to use C# bindings to a non-GC language. Put all available memory under control of a pool allocator and enjoy the perf gain.

	▲	edoceo 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Similar solution worked for ASP back in 1999. ASP/VBS was terrible slow at string building and Response.Write. Build it in the fast code and then output.

▲

matthewbarras 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

market decides - just like kickstarter

▲

fragmede 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It indicates the level of trust people have in the platform, and the combination of the product-platform behavior. If someone with the wherewithal to solve garbage collection for C# for HFT could actually describe why GC in C# was a problem, they wouldn't be asking for $10. But for $10, for something something you're dimly aware of is a problem? I'd throw $10 at some nonsense I read on the Internet.

> What happens when the pool exhausts but the task is not done?

Have a stupider LLM aggregate similar questions.