| ▲ | smlacy 2 hours ago | |
So you're implying that someone in a locked Waymo was assaulted at gunpoint from outside the vehicle? These are rolling surveillance machines (in a good way?) and virtually every aspect of this would be caught on probably a dozen cameras. I'd be surprised if this hypothetical scenario has ever happened, and if it has, I'd love to see the evidence. | ||
| ▲ | lokar 32 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
I think people vastly overestimate the extent to which would be criminals think ahead to the likelihood of being caught and the severity of the punishment. | ||
| ▲ | freediddy an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
You mean like this? https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/17/technology/trapped-inside... | ||
| ▲ | ethbr1 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
> virtually every aspect of this would be caught on probably a dozen cameras If only there were a widely available technology to conceal ones face... | ||
| ▲ | vamos_davai 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Cameras aren't going to stop a crime in progress. | ||
| ▲ | BoorishBears 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
You're laying on enough qualifiers that even a recent robbery of a Waymo is precluded, because (if we really want to victim blame) their window was down which is asking for it. But overall, not sure why the tone of these replies: then Venn diagram of "wants to rob people" and "cares Google's AV will record it" doesn't include as much overlap as you're implying. A Waymo has even been used as a getaway vehicle a few times now, once even successfully | ||