| ▲ | colechristensen 3 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
>how far are we from a more plug and play home solar system that becomes a primary energy source as opposed to a limited secondary source? We don't need a more plug and play system. A zero agreement interconnection for whatever UL certified 300W-ish scale is fine and should be widely deployed. There needing to be interconnection agreements with your utility and an inspection is not a blocker that needs to be removed. Most places require a licensed electrician for complex work, having the electrician fill out a form and having a utility inspection is how things should be. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | harmmonica 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Apologies if my reply here is not understanding you, but this is counter to my experience. Plenty of people still want to handle their own energy production even if they have grid access. I've built off-grid houses. Most of the utility production is already renewable. Many people still choose to live off grid even though that's the case. It would be epic if there was a plug and play, house-scale option because the cost of installation today is... epic (so epic in fact that the overall cost of install has actually gone up even though material costs have come down). Admittedly off-grid installs are a tiny fraction of places on the planet, but it's the trigger that led me to ask about this. Perhaps you're just responding because I brought up grid tie (fair!), but I'm wondering why not aspire to remove the blocker, which would mean de-risking the installation so that laypeople could do it without having to get an electrician involved (which is what's so amazing about balcony). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||