Remix.run Logo
solenoid0937 2 hours ago

You'd be fine if the PRC gets to ASI first? That's an interesting opinion.

thewebguyd 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It has nothing to do with being "fine" if the PRC or anyone else for that matter get to some speculative and hypothetical ASI first. There are zero US regulations that would be effective to prevent that.

US regulations apply to US companies and citizens, exclusively. Anthropic crowding out all future potential competitors in the US via regulatory capture has no weight on what the rest of the world does.

Unless you are proposing military action over a speculative sci-fi future

dragonwriter 17 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> You'd be fine if the PRC gets to ASI first?

How do rules that inhibit what AI can be sold on the US market (adding additional costs to trading in that market) do anything to inhibit a competing nation from reaching ASI first? Insofar as they inhibit anyone from reaching ASI, its firms whose primary commercial interest is selling AI services in the US market, not foreign threat actors except to the extent those two categories overlap.

axus 5 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yes, why wouldn't I be? How is that worse than China getting it second?

zozbot234 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

PRC labs reportedly aren't even thinking about getting to ASI, much less trying. They think of AI as a technology that can provide utility across the board even without anything like superhuman smarts.

ff3 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

A lot of this lust for ASI is driven by America attempting to cling onto the power it has wielded over the world over the past 50 odd yrs.

It smells of paranoia.

solenoid0937 an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Nope, they're accelerating towards superhuman smarts as fast as they can too.

nozzlegear an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Your loaded question presumes that "ASI" is anything more tangible than a useful marketing myth.

shimman 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

No, because there is zero reason to think LLMs will lead to it but we do know that the massive LLM investment has a huge financial risk for the US. Not too mention it's exacerbating the climate crisis (you know the actual thing that might end civilization, not a fantasy delusion of AGI), giving citizens cancer that live next to data centers, the extreme decrease in quality of life, and the misallocation of capital while Americans lack healthcare, childcare, housing, and education.

Also don't believe China is actually a threat to the world. That's some cold war delusional think you got there.

All the companies seem to believe is that it's okay to immiserate a large percentage for the pursuit of money, you seem to believe the lies they're feeding you.