Opus is nowhere close to Fable. Fable feels at least one generation ahead to me. https://x.com/hyperagentapp/status/2064396004032463157

Edit: OpenAI will launch a similar model soon and I can't wait. We are entering a new era of agents.

▲

CuriouslyC 37 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Models are spiky. In some narrow domains (cybersecurity, for instance) it will be a generation ahead. On the other hand a lot of people don't see a measurable difference between Opus ~4.5 and 4.6/7/8, because Anthropic taught it how to do some hard stuff better, but they didn't give it better taste or make it produce cleaner solutions to simpler problems.

▲

zozbot234 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Fable is very much an incremental development over Opus, and even more incremental when properly compared to its existing counterparts GPT-Pro and Gemini Deep Research.

▲

2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

kolinko 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

▲

itintheory 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Care to share any specifics?

	▲	noworriesnate an hour ago \| parent [-]
		I have a design for a really complex software I want to build and there were gaps I knew of in the design. Opus couldn’t identify them but Fable did. I’m just talking about it reviewing the design, not coding. But yeah, it’s insanely expensive. It does spin off sub agents so I suspect it might be cheaper if you had it create a bunch of plan files and then pointed deepseek at this plan files or something like that

▲

conjectures 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

What does this even mean?

	▲	beng-nl 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Can you write a more specific question? I think the meaning of the comment is clear enough, but maybe you’re asking for more specifics? Ironically I can not understand what you are asking for with such a generic comment.
	▲	solenoid0937 an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I added a link.