> The Liberals need to be shown quite explicitly by people in our profession how this will harm our industry...

It will not hurt American FDI nor VC within in the Canadian tech industry, which represents the bulk of capital within the Canadian tech scene. We are fine operating in China, Israel, India, Brazil, the UK, SK, Taiwan, and Japan who have similarly onerous requirements.

> There is not enough noise about this bill...

The Freedom Convoy which was fueled by COVID disinfo, as well as active foreign interference in Canadian elections [0] highlights the need for Canada to protect itself.

Look at how the UK has devolved into near yearly race riots often instigated by foreign actors over social media [1]. Canada has the same weaknesses and a hard state response is required.

Canada doesn't have free speech laws like we do in the US, but even in the US you "cannot yet fire in a crowded theatre".

Edit: can't reply

> Yep. And that is a very good thing. Hate speech is illegal here

I agree.

And thus, how can you identify where hate speech is originating when platforms will not cooperate with law enforcement without C22?

Hate speech laws are useless if you cannot identify where said hate speech is originating from.

[0] - https://www.canada.ca/en/security-intelligence-service/corpo...

[1] - https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/comme...

▲

hodder 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You cannot be serious. The Freedom convoy may have been misinformed but the government response was an absolute disaster and the courts have agreed.

▲

cmrdporcupine 2 hours ago | parent [-]

"Misinformed" is a strange word for what was clearly an attempt at a coup, with massive amounts of foreign money involved?

The RCMP and other agencies and the province were not doing their job. I was not a fan of Trudeau, but I don't really know what they could have done to resolve the situation.

(And that is in fact one of the reasons I'm suspicious and critical of this bill. I don't think giving law enforcement agencies additional powers will resolve anything, as when push comes to shove they are often full of people on the same side as the malevolent forces that sibling / parent commenter is referring to)

▲

giantg2 2 hours ago | parent [-]

This is the first I've heard that called a coup. Was there and actual overthrow attempt?

▲

cmrdporcupine 2 hours ago | parent [-]

It was clearly communicated by their leaders that they weren't leaving the streets until the government resigned (or "all pandemic measures dropped", which the fed gov't had no power to do as the majority were either provincial mandates or were forced on us by the US gov't)

Also the exact same set of people (and I mean, literally, look up the names of the leaders) tried almost exactly the same thing a few years earlier around carbon tax and environmental issues. But the government was stronger then and Canadians more united.

And yes, they had massive and well documented funding from American conservative lobby groups, in both instances.

▲

hylaride 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That's not a coup. That's an illegal protest. They were all a bunch of self-centred idiots, but let's not give them credit for something that it wasn't.

	▲	cmrdporcupine 4 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Illegal protest that involves the dissolution of an elected government, and the leader of the opposition hob-knobbing with them? Maybe not technically a coup if there's an election held right after, fair. Let's just agree to call it "tried to overthrow the government."

▲

dismalaf 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

A coup d'état is when you forcibly overthrow a government AND install someone else illegally (usually yourselves). Asking the current government to resign isn't a coup by any definition.

	▲	cmrdporcupine 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Yes, that's why they had PP bringing them donuts and coffee

▲

EmbarrassedHelp 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That is a lie. None of those countries other than maybe China have laws requiring encryption backdoors.

Suspicionless bulk metadata retention is also illegal in the EU, and no such law existing in many of those other democracies you listed.

▲

anamax an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> even in the US you "cannot yet fire in a crowded theatre".

Actually, you can yell "fire" if there is a fire.

Note that the "can't yell fire" quote comes from a decision involving folks who were distributing pamphlets opposing the WWI draft. It was written by Holmes, who also wrote "three generations of idiots are enough" to justify a eugenics law, in a case that didn't involve any idiots.

Moreover, the "fire" decision was overturned by Brandenberg v Ohio.

▲

2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

cmrdporcupine 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Two things can be true at the same time.

That you're right about "Freedom" Convoy (and "Alberta" seppies) etc.

And that this a bad and harmful bill.

Given CSIS has plenty of powers already and hasn't done anything to deal with the actions far right American (and domestic) groups, I don't see why I would trust them with my or my family's chat histories or why I should have to live without Signal or ProtonMail, etc. as product offerings in my country.

▲

alephnerd 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> Given CSIS has plenty of powers already...

> hasn't done anything to deal with the actions far right American (and domestic) groups...

They don't. They are one of the weaker intel agencies amongst the five eyes (NZ is weakest) due to overlapping responsibilities and jurisdictions with the RCMP and Provincial law enforcement. And there are active issues with certain provincial LE agencies and foreign interference.

▲

hodder 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

	▲	cmrdporcupine 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Oh. I see. Now I regret engaging with you at all on the other comment. My SIN begins with a 6 and my whole family is still there, and you're wrong as hell, and the majority of Albertans agree with me and Smith would never have been elected if she'd run on this.

▲

2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

realo 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

"Canada doesn't have the free speech laws like we do in the US..."

Yep. And that is a very good thing. Hate speech is illegal here.