They didn't apologize for doing it, they are sorry they were caught doing it. They still nerf the model if your request is about AI development.

▲

Someone1234 3 hours ago | parent [-]

They didn't get "caught." It was published, by them, when they released Fable a few days ago. They were very clear about it.

It wasn't the correct way of handling the problem they were trying to address, but they definitely didn't hide it by any reasonable definition.

▲

SilverElfin 3 hours ago | parent [-]

No, it was not clear. No one expects that a tool they pay for and use professionally to purposefully sabotage their work. You’re excusing their unhinged behavior.

https://xcancel.com/hammer_mt/status/2064839924398825798

▲

whimsicalism 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Excusing? Their comment is factually correct and the parent is factually wrong.

▲

ryandrake 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Making excuses for billion+ dollar companies' behavior is one of the most common HN comment section pastimes.

▲

joxdosba 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Only second to making intellectually dishonest criticisms of perceived behaviours

▲

behnamoh 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I think your comment refers to @Someone1234.

	▲	ryandrake an hour ago \| parent [-]
		It's a very generalized observation. I sometimes think of the HN comment section as the Billionaire's Defense League.