| ▲ | TazeTSchnitzel 2 days ago | |
I would rather see native browser support for the familiar MHTML (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40873) than creating a brand new format that does the same thing. The AI slop homepage is really offputting too. | ||
| ▲ | xnx 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |
Chrome started supporting this at some point (though I wish they would've added in motw support). Lack of support for mhtml is one of the things keeping me away from Firefox on mobile. | ||
| ▲ | Tade0 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
> Opened 26 years ago Updated 27 days ago That's a particularly long discussion. | ||
| ▲ | bjt12345 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
This cute homepage provides me with nostalgic memories of Geocities spinning skull GIFs. | ||
| ▲ | yeargun 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Completely agree with that. But look whats the situation with MHTML. """ Open Bug 40873 Opened 26 years ago Updated 27 days ago """ So if you need some such feature in your web app, and if you are okay with 2kb encode/decode js. Its all good. At least the posts are pretty much not AI slop I guess.. But I'll take your feedback. Thanks! | ||