Not buying it. The idea that deciding and delivering are things only humans can do with their intelligence seems faulty.

As it stands AIs today are not always great at making decisions (but they're getting much better), and orgs of today still trust people and hold people to account, rather than their AI systems.

Neither of these are strong moats. It's a moat only while AI systems have some limitations vs an expert human, and corporate processes are still extremely human-centric.

▲

RA_Fisher 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Agree, AIs are better decision-makers on average than people (just look at the grifters we've given power to). These are machines that can perform more advanced mathematics than even the most advanced mathematicians.

▲

logicchains 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> orgs of today still trust people and hold people to account >Neither of these are strong moats

Having accountable people in key positions is a very important part of running a successful organization. Anthropic and OpenAI are never going to let you sue them when an AI employee makes a mistake; accountability is a strong moat.

	▲	kypro 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		You sue bad employees? Most companies just hire someone else? In the future if you can't trust your AI system to perform a function well, you can switch to another. The accountability will be different – instead of an employee being accountable because their income depends on it, a corporation deploying the AI system be accountable because their success depends on it. We already see this today with coding. If you're paying too much for the code Claude produces or unhappy with its output, you stop paying for Claude and switch to another.