"Sending a message to your mother should not require infrastructure comparable to a small bank."

To that end, requiring the use of GitHub for your application to work is a dead end.

"Macaroni Messenger is a distributed messaging system"

No.

"The backend does not exist."

Unless by "backend" you mean the underlying infrastructure and server logic you've made the clients depend on for the exchange of messages to happen.

▲

snowflaxxx 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

That’s fair criticism of the current implementation.

The idea isn’t that transport magically disappears. The idea is that users don’t have to deploy, operate, pay for, or even think about transport.

GitHub happens to provide one out of the box, which makes the proof of concept extremely easy to try.

If I need to run databases, message brokers, servers and monitoring just to send my mom “please cook macaroni”, I’ve already lost interest.

▲

boomlinde 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

> The idea isn’t that transport magically disappears. The idea is that users don’t have to deploy, operate, pay for, or even think about transport.

It's sharing this advantage with every other free, third party managed communication service I can choose to depend on. It's also sharing the weakness that it puts me at the mercy of whatever third party I am relying on. It introduces a new weakness in that the third party being relied on here never intended for their infrastructure to be used in this way.

> If I need to run databases, message brokers, servers and monitoring just to send my mom “please cook macaroni”, I’ve already lost interest.

So don't. To that end, what specific problem does this address that other free third party communication service providers don't? My mother will have seen my email or SMS before you have instructed your mother on how to join GitHub and get an API token. We don't even need to agree on or stick to a provider.

▲

Hugsbox 2 days ago | parent [-]

I don't think this was meant to be taken as seriously as you seem to be taking it

	▲	boomlinde 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		I'm directly addressing arguments made by the person I responded to. I'm not going to be taking you seriously, because you are not.

▲

fartcoin67 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]

▲

antran22 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Saying that this doesn't use a backend is like saying serverless app doesn't run on a server

	▲	timw4mail a day ago \| parent [-]
		...and that's why I've always hated that name

▲

functionmouse 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

torrents need trackers but we still consider them peer to peer

crypto needs nodes but we still consider them decentralized

direct tcp/ip communication still requires routing but etc

	▲	ShinyLeftPad 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		> torrents need trackers but we still consider them peer to peer false. there's DHT and we sometimes exchange magnet links with friends and trackers are optional. trackers just allow it easier and at scale. > crypto needs nodes but we still consider them decentralized It's only decentralized when somebody doesn't get to control enough nodes. Even if it was decentralized, it's apples to oranges. It's not serverless or peer to peer and this messenger is not distributed.