| ▲ | nl 2 hours ago | |||||||
A word of caution on this. I've tried this too, and was disappointed. Kimi generally benchmarks at "a bit more intelligent than Sonnet Medium" levels[1] and I'd agree broadly with this assessment. If you have adapted your coding to rely on the agentic style that is doable in Opus 4.7+ then you will find Kimi disappointing. If you are using it in a more targeted way then it can work well. [1] https://artificialanalysis.ai/agents/coding-agents?agents=cl... | ||||||||
| ▲ | kouteiheika 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
Yes, I would agree with this. I think it works best when you're using the agent in a more hands-on way with a targeted prompt. If you're obsessive about code quality like I am (so you thoroughly review and, when needed, reprompt or even rewrite what the agent does) then you'll be fine, but if you like to just throw a prompt at the wall and expect it to plan and execute the whole thing perfectly then you'll be disappointed. A middle-ground trick one can use is to have Opus (or Fable now) plan the whole thing and get something cheaper like Kimi execute on it. | ||||||||
| ||||||||