Remix.run Logo
Sephr 3 hours ago

I make privacy tooling and Fable 5 rejects the vast majority of my prompts to analyze and improve the software that I've written. It's bleak.

matheusmoreira 5 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Anthropic refused to let Fable analyze my own project's memory safety, the one thing I absolutely wanted it to do. Even Fable thought it was stupid.

make3 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Why is this surprising or a problem?! It's a model demo, & their reasoning is reasonable and fair. Why all this drama.

CuriouslyC 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Some people find Anthropic's special blend of paternalism and random incompetence tiresome.

anakaine 23 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Tech demo + theres the ability to provide feedback right at the answer interface if using the UI.

Provide feedback in the negative, a brief explanation, and move on with your day. It will improve with feedback, not with whinging into the void.

cardy31 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Because most people in tech never took a philosophy course or an ethics course and think that tech is obviously a good for the world and that there are no downsides to advancing tech. So any efforts that try to apply ethics to it are overreaching, ignorant, and futile in the face of the good that is tech!

borski an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Not any efforts.

But this one is certainly allowed to be a dumb effort, if it is.

Not all things that are called “ethical” or “safety” are worth doing.

vzcx 15 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Or... they just disagree with Anthropic's ethical stances and approach to applying them?

enraged_camel an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

I like this take. Especially because one of the sibling comments framed Anthropic's stance as "paternalism." Trying to be ethical and to minimize harm, even at great expense to one's finances and reputation, is paternalistic apparently.

zmgsabst 44 minutes ago | parent [-]

No — we’ve just taken Ethics 102 as well, so we understand good intentions don’t entail positive outcomes, therefore you may need to criticize or oppose people who state good intentions to bring about good outcomes.

Insulting and demeaning people for that, rather than engaging their arguments in good faith, is a breach of ethics.

epolanski 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Because you're being allowed to ask and work only on topics that a certain company decides.

Local inference has never been so important as it is now.