Fortunately I can't use Fable anyway, since their hyperactive content flaggers do not let you work on anything remotely biological or medical related (i.e. parse a CSV with some medical content, nope, you're probably a bioterrorist) and you get downgraded to Opus immediately.

▲

nmfisher 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I'm not even working on anything biological/medical, almost all PyTorch work is getting flagged (not even a safety notice and a downgrade, just an outright refusal with "this is against our ToS").

▲

torginus 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

My 2 cents is that doctors people with lots of money and very specific needs who generally don't really go for tech jobs, so they're probably planning to create a separate monetization tier.

That, or alternatively, Mythos is so good at medical stuff, that it cam replace a lot of physician work 90% of the time, pissing off doctors, while the remaining 10% would result in very expensive lawsuits.

	▲	DrewADesign 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> That, or alternatively, Mythos is so good at medical stuff, that it cam replace a lot of physician work 90% of the time, pissing off doctors Well they definitely don’t give a teaspoon of shit about putting people out of work by hawking munged-up versions of those people’s data, which was involuntarily ‘ingested’ for the benefit of society (in a way that happened to fuel a centabillion dollar industry.) So it’s prolly not that one.
	▲	peyton 28 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		More likely whomever they’re consulting is protecting their own bags.

▲

pbgcp2026 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yes! I have hit the same brick wall. What sort of idiots are doing this? Honestly, I have no idea. And just before their IPO. SO far Anthropic marketing has been perfect and spotless. This is serious slipup.

▲

sigmar an hour ago | parent | next [-]

It's temporary. From the fable blogpost:

>To release the model both safely and quickly, we’ve tuned these safeguards conservatively—they’ll sometimes catch harmless requests, though they trigger, on average, in less than 5% of sessions. With more capable models arriving in the coming months, we’re working to improve our safeguards and reduce false positives as quickly as we can.

▲

solenoid0937 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It's good they're being overcautious here. The alternative is far worse.

▲

siva7 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The alternative of... saving lives?

	▲	anigbrowl an hour ago \| parent [-]
		They don't want the real risk of someone using it to make biological or genetically targeted weapons, and they don't want the social risk of someone asking it a bunch of leading questions in order to 'prove' some racist thesis or to 'prove' Mythos is woke if it declines to along with their performative inquiry. Let's face it, if some rando comes up to and asks if you have a few minutes to talk about population biology there's a good chance they're a kook.

▲

airstrike 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Will someone think of the children