the real risk is using it at all as you are already sending them your data. If you are ok with that, then this retention/review seems ok.

▲

pbgcp2026 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

There were two (expensive) exceptions / alternatives so far: Bedrock and Vertex. Their Zero Data Retention was in fact contractually enforced. Now it is all f...d because of these morons at Anthropic. For now I am better off just using DS via their API.

This is just a tragic moment for Tech. We just killed AI privacy. OpenAI already follows this trend and others will do too.

The only hope now is ... tada .. Mistral LOL

▲

osti 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Hmmm no? The only way is to deploy your own local model, using anyone else's you are at their whim on what happens to your data.

	▲	dannyw 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		It’s not binary. With AWS previously you have contractual guarantees with a third party, that’s been in business for a couple decades, which explicitly state zero seconds of data retention - only as long as needed for inference. Consider the security angle too. You now have to rely on Anthropic’s infrastructure security. You did not previously when you used Bedrock/Vertex/etc.

▲

Daedren 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

From a personal use perspective yes, the big issue here is enterprise and existing contracts as surely most companies will have signed zero retention.