| ▲ | pseudalopex 5 hours ago |
| It is normal, expected, and healthy to offer criticism of self interested proposals. And mock even. What is unhealthy is to imply someone said what they did not. |
|
| ▲ | tptacek 4 hours ago | parent [-] |
| If that's what this is, a bank-shot snarky criticism of the proposal, fair enough. I read it instead as a criticism of a stakeholder having the temerity to make a proposal in the first place. It's not their job to anticipate and capture all your objections. That's your job! |
| |
| ▲ | pseudalopex 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Everyone holds a stake in this discussion. And intellectual honesty is everyone's obligation. | | |
| ▲ | tptacek 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yes, that is a shorter way of saying what I just said. | | |
| ▲ | pseudalopex 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Amodei did not fail to anticipate and capture all objections. He dishonestly avoided well known objections. This was what you meant? | | |
| ▲ | tptacek 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | No, it is not his job to state all the objections you might have to his proposal! That's your job. | | |
| ▲ | pseudalopex an hour ago | parent [-] | | > all the objections you might have My comment before corrected this straw man clearly. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | movealongnow 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| ▲ | tptacek 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Sorry, audibly chuckling about the idea of software developers who consider themselves "everyday working class people". Keep it coming, Tom Morello. |
|
|
