> AI companies that develop advanced AI models must have strong security standards that protect their model weights

So, basically, make open-weight models illegal. It's nice for Dario to come out and say this so explicitly.

Dario's been beating the regulatory capture drum for several years at various intervals, always in the name of safety, but it's hard to not see how self-serving it is.

I'm personally very tired of reading the linear-algebra-median of every AI safety essay from lesswrong with the inserted opinion of "therefore all my competitors, especially those pesky open source ones from scary countries should be illegal, only I can be trusted to not abuse the computer god that I definitely will have in just a couple more releases and with a couple more trillion invested"

People ask what the 'open' part of 'OpenAI' even means as they're a for-profit company.

It turns out it means 'opener than Anthropic.'

"We Have No Moat, And Neither Does OpenAI"