>and they can do so in secret

Is that really true? Zero Data Retention (ZDR) is standard language in enterprise contracts and it seems quite egregious a vendor would want to take on that amount of liability and ignore the contract terms.

On top of that, Anthropic is SOC2 and ISO27001 so they've had _some_ independent auditing (although they could still try to hide such logging/recording anyway)

With that in mind, they also have a hell of an incentive to _not_ secretly collect that data.

Of course ZDR oftentimes comes with contract minimums so individuals and small corps are locked out and subject to the whims of the provider.

▲

sidewndr46 3 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Remember that time that Amazon swore they weren't using data to outcompete people on their platform? Then they did that.

▲

ipnoipipme 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yeah cause all these frontier labs totally followed all relevant copyright and ip protection laws, so of course they'll follow your little contract, and what will be the consequences when it turns out they lied (again)? Oh maybe a fine, something fair like 0.5% of profits, can't make it too high or too anti business.

	▲	nijave 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		>Oh maybe a fine, something fair like 0.5% of profits, can't make it too high or too anti business. No, this would be a civil lawsuit not criminal. The plaintiff (the harmed party) could sue Anthropic for whatever they wanted. Put another way, they're at the mercy of big corp army of lawyers, not a paid off politician.

▲

wslh 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]