Remix.run Logo
jeffreysmith 6 hours ago

I played a somewhat unusual role in this whole story. I was the guy who acquired in the original Papers with Code and managed them after they joined Facebook/Meta.

It was super sad to see FB/M abandon the original mission of what PwC was building towards and let the original community resource rot. During the good times, we always talked about how PwC related to HF. So, I think there is a sort poetry to PwC winding up as part of HF, where they probably always belonged. No company is perfect, but HF has been a better than average steward of open source and community resources.

For the younger folks on this thread, you probably have no real feel for just how frustratingly inefficient AI/ML research used to be before people like Robert and Ross of PwC came along to start to bring structure, sanity, and reproducibility to the information needed to work of this kind. And of course, Clem, Julien, and Thomas of HF kicked off an even bigger effort to tame the previously scattered workflow of open AI research into some sort of sane stack.

It's clear that, in 2026, what PwC could be is something much more evolved than what we were able to do back in the day. LLMs + PwC is a huge design space. I hope nielz_r and friends at HF are able to make something truly useful for the community. AI research has both gotten way easier and much harder. e.g. We have a Fable, but Anthro won't let us use it forward our science. Community resources for research are still very much needed.

Best of luck Son of PwC. May you thrive.

peterfirefly 3 hours ago | parent [-]

PricewaterhouseCoopers? Hydrofluoric acid?

knicholes 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Are you a bot? Look in the title. Papers with code.

camdenreslink 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

To be fair PwC is a very well established initialism. It would be like saying HTTP but actually referring to something other than the well understood meaning of that thing.

clickety_clack 4 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Its not even just commonly used. I’d say if papers with code tried to refer to themselves as PwC they’d get a cease and desist.

stronglikedan 30 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> To be fair PwC is a very well established initialism.

If that were the case, I'd expect to be able to learn what it stands for in the first page of google results, but alas...

And you know what is on the front page? PricewaterhouseCoopers

camdenreslink 17 minutes ago | parent [-]

I think you agree with me? It is unambiguously associated with PricewaterhouseCoopers.

minimaxir 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The context of the PwC acronym is extremely unambigious in the comment.

throawayonthe 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

what's the well established initialism?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PWC is it one of these?

peterfirefly an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

No, but I hate TLA overuse. Don't you?

"Are you a bot" is an obvious slur when it's easy to see for yourself that I'm not.

wahnfrieden an hour ago | parent [-]

It’s not overuse when first use in context is spelled out.

digitalPhonix 11 minutes ago | parent [-]

I still don't see where HF is explained?