| ▲ | jerf 7 hours ago | |||||||
Which will work for the several weeks it takes for the other commercial providers to follow suit. The tides are turning. AI companies are IPO'ing. They've gotten where they are by selling $5 bills for $1, to update the old VC adage. I think we can look forward to them rewriting the contracts, both literal and social, on AI going forward to capture a lot more of the value. Or, to put it in more HN-friendly terms, it may not be immediately obvious on a casual viewing, but you're looking at the beginning of the enshittification process hitting AI. The term is a bit deceptive in some sense, because it's not like anyone ever sets out with a terminal goal of making something shitty. It's downstream of trying to capture more value in the customer/vendor relationship by not giving the customer any more value than is barely necessary. How's coding with qwen doing? The only thing that's going to stop the AI providers from extracting all the value until it's just barely worth using is the free competition. | ||||||||
| ▲ | abofh 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Bedrock supports many models. Open weights models aren't far behind, maybe a year, 18 months. Given they could have done this with data residency rules being respected and chose not to suggests all I need to know - this is for Anthropics IPO, not for user safety | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | tyingq 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Surely some provider will see the then open opportunity and offer something to capture it. | ||||||||