No, we are unhappy because there is no guarantee that my corporate documents wont be shared or trained on. We are already paying plus for using bedrock instead of the API version from Anthropic, so now there is no reason to use bedrock anymore. This whole thing about this model being too powerful to share is just the usual BS. Is an advanced model that dont have guardrails, just like the models that have been shared with the US government for years.

▲

ValentineC 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> We are already paying plus for using bedrock instead of the API version from Anthropic, so now there is no reason to use bedrock anymore.

Doesn't Bedrock have the same API token pricing as paying Anthropic direct?

	▲	EwanToo 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Yes, it's exactly the same price

▲

pixl97 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

>This whole thing about this model being too powerful to share is just the usual BS.

Then stop using AI.

>But I want it all and I want it now.

Spend a trillion dollars and make your own model.

>No fair!

Then petition your government to enact laws around this. Unfortunately the US government rules are currently "Yes, we want AI to take over the world with terminators, just as long as they share data with us".

▲

Hizonner 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

... but you were silent when they did it to consumers...

▲

sailfast 6 hours ago | parent [-]

The consumers were paying for tokens with their data. If you pay for the tokens yourself the expectation is that your data doesn’t get trained on or used.

	▲	astrange 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Query streams aren't really useful data in any sense. Just like nobody else is actually profiting from "selling your data".