| ▲ | 8note 6 hours ago | |||||||
its not inaccurate though. consider Purdue pharma - the Sacklers got off with all their wealth intact because they were too big to sue and properly collect money for their victims. | ||||||||
| ▲ | oaiey 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
But we agree that this was also wrong, right? | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | drawfloat 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
No they got away with it through a combination of lax pharmaceutical laws, and because they were rich and connected to the officials who should have investigated them. They're also almost universally regarded as having committed evil acts at this point, so who cares why they got away with it? | ||||||||
| ▲ | intended 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Just because someone got away with it means everyone should get away with it ? | ||||||||