| ▲ | nomel 5 days ago | |
https://www.copyright.gov/newsnet/2025/1060.html > It concludes that the outputs of generative AI can be protected by copyright only where a human author has determined sufficient expressive elements. This can include situations where a human-authored work is perceptible in an AI output, or a human makes creative arrangements or modifications of the output, but not the mere provision of prompts. Well that's interesting. | ||
| ▲ | wongarsu 5 days ago | parent [-] | |
Also "just" the legal opinion of a government office. It has yet to be tested in court | ||