How could anything else make any sense? Platforms are getting used to provide dangerous broken products and get away with it. There should be some limit to it.

Next do Amazon that is selling AI generated foraging books: - https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/sep/01/mushroom-...

When I was a kid it was possible to buy any foraging books from a store and they had a minimum quality. Is that so difficult to achieve? Is profiteering not punished anymore?

▲

TZubiri 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

>How could anything else make any sense?

Well, they disclaimed and the user acknowledged

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-QaEB5eXSU Minute 3:00

	▲	Ravus 3 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Disclaimers and user acceptance does not remove liability for slander, particularly against third parties. In fact, in most EU countries "the user acknowledged" works only for a very small subset of stuff, precisely because our lawmakers know that the strong party in a contract would use that to get away from every legal obligation.
	▲	9dev an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Luckily it doesn't work like this in the EU.

▲

Robotbeat 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Should we hold scientists and journalists liable if they say false things or misrepresent things?

	▲	FabCH 5 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		We already do. Libel and fraud are already illegal.
	▲	novemp 6 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		Yes, obviously.
	▲	themafia 5 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		If they do so knowingly, and harm is caused, then yes. Are you suggesting we should give them a pass from years of acquired jurisprudence simply because they hold a particular title? And what institution gives out the licenses for journalists and scientists? Is it revokable?
	▲	atoav 4 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		You don't?