| ▲ | jltsiren 2 hours ago | |||||||||||||
Creating competition where it would not otherwise exist is the essential nature of the EU. Originally it was mostly about forcing protectionist member states to accept competition from other member states. But they extended the approach to breaking perceived natural monopolies a long time ago. The exact rules ultimately don't matter, because the EU is after outcomes. If the current rules don't lead to the desired outcomes, they will keep changing the rules, until they get what they wanted. (Or until their goals change.) | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Terretta an hour ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||
Destroying competition by removing the consumer choice for vertical integration in service of strong security, privacy, reliability, etc.... is mistaken. It's competing at the wrong level. The iPhone is a toaster. Nobody's up in arms about whether the toaster takes other manufacturer's crumb tray. It's a television, and nobody's demanding QLED and OLED be swappable. It's a console. Xbox doesn't play PS5 games. It's fine. There's no real line between hardware / firmware / software / malware ... For what Apple offers consumers, every layer of whateverware should be trusted. Drawing imaginary lines based on the embodiment or substrates for logic gates is mistaken. There are lots of phones. Lot's of different philosophies. Stop taking away consumer right to pick a philosophy and design for an end to end experience. It's fine. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||