| ▲ | advisedwang 4 hours ago | |||||||
Google pays to be the default search because they make more from selling ads on those searches than they are paying for the search. I don't see the same thing here. Google isn't making any money from being the assistant in Apple, so why would they pay to be it? | ||||||||
| ▲ | erikerikson 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Yet? Maybe they are but embedding adds or paid signal amplification/probability tweaking has already been floated on the market and may already be a product. | ||||||||
| ▲ | tantalor 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
For Google, search quality is a moat. And it's becoming apparent that AI quality is a moat as well. | ||||||||
| ▲ | speed_spread 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
It doesn't matter if it's classic search or LLM. They can monetize tracking information as easily as they can sell ads. They'll have fast cheap custom-built assistant models that run on device by default, keeping things profitable. In time they'll likely double-dip again by injecting product placement in results. | ||||||||
| ||||||||