| ▲ | tpdly 5 hours ago | |||||||||||||
Apple would have to allow USERS the possibility of giving any virtual assistant direct access to their own private data. Is that accurate? | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | wtallis 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
That's the way to phrase it if you want to ignore or downplay the leverage that big tech companies have over their users to get them to consent to shady business practices using dark patterns. But this wouldn't be an issue to begin with if it was safe to assume that users fully understand what an app will do with their data, and if it was safe to assume that the app's data-handling practices could not drastically change at the developer's whims. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | crooked-v 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
Apple doesn't trust other providers. See, for example, the ongoing attempts by Facebook & co to exfiltrate as much data as possible. A theoretical Facebook alternative here to super-Siri would have a pipe to slurp up the entire phone's data. This kind of thing overlaps with the anti-competitive practices driven by Apple's MBAs (like the whole thing with Epic), but it's a genuine concern and one their engineering people think about a lot. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||