| ▲ | 1vuio0pswjnm7 6 hours ago | |
"Last week I went on Bloomberg and discussed the state of the AI bubble with a clarity that rattled even the sweatiest boosters, mostly because I spoke with clarity about an investment frenzy whipped up through hype, deceit and mythology." Bloomberg is interested in what he has to say But not HN commenters | ||
| ▲ | 1vuio0pswjnm7 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
"Can I Advertise On Your Newsletter? Yes! Email me at ed@ezpr.com. I have an extremely high bar both for advertisers and the cost of advertising on here - I have 84,000 subscribers and a 55-60% open rate, as well as an 8-11% clickthrough rate. I do not do any kind of outcome-based advertisement (IE: X number of people click through and you pay me Y), so any kind of agreement would effectively be a sponsorship. I have an engaged reader base and you will have to pay to get in front of them, as I also do not need advertising to support this newsletter." Maybe the "AI" companies could pay for sponsorship Would he take the money and run their ads | ||
| ▲ | tim333 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Well there are a lot of commenters so presumably some interest. I just had a look at the Bloomberg bit https://youtu.be/zbKDmkJPVvI and didn't see sweaty boosters rattled, just Ed doing his usual spiel - they are loss making and so it's all a big con. Which is kind of unproven on the big con bit. | ||
| ▲ | 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
| [deleted] | ||