| ▲ | kypro 2 hours ago | |||||||
Another problem is that US models are all closed source, and if you're a large corporate you may not want your org to be held hostage by OpenAI / Anthropic. I genuinely don't understand what moat these US model labs have. If they're saying recursive self improvement is just around the corner and Chinese labs are only slightly behind the leading US models, what moat does the US labs have? Are the US models going to recursively self improve better than the Chinese open source ones or something? I might be completely wrong about this, but if I had money in OpenAI or Anthropic I'd be pulling it all right now. I think the chance of them going to near-zero over the next few years is very significant. | ||||||||
| ▲ | lokar 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Their moat is cash to pay politicians to regulate away competition. | ||||||||
| ▲ | hobofan an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
> you may not want your org to be held hostage by OpenAI / Anthropic Or Google. I'm working with multiple customers right now that are very pissed at Google for deprecating Gemini 2.5 Flash, canning the GA release of 3.0 Flash and now have to decide whether to bite the bullet of the 5x price increase for 3.5 Flash or switching providers. Quite a few of them will likely fully pivot to open models. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | ChrisClark an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I think they are racing because the first ASI will 'win', preventing others, of course we won't be able to bake the right goals into it though. | ||||||||
| ||||||||