| ▲ | metadat 7 hours ago | |
Agreed. I am open to the possibility of the bubble bursting or whatever, but this piece is like 3,000 words and cites everything as evidence the sky is falling. It's just as bad as the pro-AI grifters, just in the other direction. Does the truth normally lie somewhere in the middle of it all? | ||
| ▲ | marcosdumay 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
At the /. times, there was somebody there with the best signature line. It was something like: "Some people say the Sun sets at East, other people say it sets at West. The truth, of course, is certainly on the middle." | ||
| ▲ | viccis 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
>Does the truth normally lie somewhere in the middle of it all? Usually does when you decide what constitutes extreme. | ||
| ▲ | kunai 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Probably. Although I feel more inclined to forgive Ed in this case because it's sort of fighting fire with fire, the insanely hyperbolic and obscenely misleading drivel that's coming out of the most ardent AI boosters is continually unchallenged in the public eye. In a world where we had a more realistic view of AI/ML/LLMs, the limits to its capabilities, and the negative externalities of its widespread adoption in places where it quite frankly does not belong, then I'd be more critical of the Chicken Little sort of writing style | ||