| ▲ | raverbashing 4 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
> Editorial choices on raw scientific data are a big no-no. I don't think you can find a picture in an article that hasn't been photoshopped in one way or another (which is mostly ok as long as it is not misleading) Edit: TF's reply is interesting https://www.thermofisher.com/es/es/home/life-science/antibod... Basically they say they are reviewing the images | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | flobosg 4 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Usually, journals require raw, unmodified data to be deposited as supplementary information. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||