| ▲ | rowbin 5 days ago | |||||||||||||
I agree, his takes should not be dismissed lightly. I'm not sure about "demand is fixed" though. I feel like software demand has been declared saturated at least a few times. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | jameshart 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
I have been making software professionally for 25 years and in all that time i have never run into the problem that we have run out of things to do. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | DonsDiscountGas 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
"fixed" is definitely incorrect but there's probably a ceiling on how fast the demand can grow, just because other bottlenecks will take over at some point. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | lelanthran 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
> I feel like software demand has been declared saturated at least a few times. It's never been declared saturated, with one exception in the six months following the dot-com crash. I've been in the industry since the mid-90s. I have not seen automation with the potential to automate away everything for the average office worker. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | leoncos 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
Agreed. The limitations of human context window and communication bandwidth restrict the complexity of large-scale software. LLM will have an extremely large context window and extremely high communication bandwidth in the future. Therefore, even more complex large-scale software will emerge. | ||||||||||||||